boris-johnson.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the boris-johnson.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host boris-johnson.com. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is 34SP.com Limited .

the related websites

london.gov.uk ft.com lbc.co.uk thejc.com bbc.co.uk hillingdonconservatives.org jo-johnson.com ukclimbing.com brudirect.com manchestereveningnews.co.uk liverpoolecho.co.uk thesun.co.uk suasnews.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

-- boris johnson search primary menu skip to content about boris photos buy boris forum contact site admin search for: articles boris johnson: americans would never accept eu restrictions – so why should we? march 13, 2016 boris johnson's columns 1 comment the american view is very clear. whether in code or en clair, the president will tell us all that uk membership of the eu is right for britain, right for europe, and right for america. and why? because that – or so we will be told – is the only way we can have “influence” in the counsels of the nations. it is an important argument, and deserves to be taken seriously. i also think it is wholly fallacious – and coming from uncle sam, it is a piece of outrageous and exorbitant hypocrisy. there is no country in the world that defends its own sovereignty with such hysterical vigilance as the united states of america. this is a nation born from its glorious refusal to accept overseas control. almost two and a half centuries ago the american colonists rose up and violently asserted the principle that they – and they alone – should determine the government of america, and not george iii or his ministers. to this day the americans refuse to kneel to almost any kind of international jurisdiction. alone of western nations, the us declines to accept that its citizens can be subject to the rulings of the international criminal court in the hague. they have not even signed up to the convention on the law of the sea. can you imagine the americans submitting their democracy to the kind of regime that we have in the eu? think of nafta – the north atlantic free trade agreement – that links the us with canada and mexico. suppose it were constituted on the lines of the eu, with a commission and a parliament and a court of justice. would the americans knuckle under – to a nafta commission and parliament generating about half their domestic law? would they submit to a nafta court of justice – supreme over all us institutions – and largely staffed by mexicans and canadians whom the people of the us could neither appoint nor remove? no way. the idea is laughable, and completely alien to american traditions. so why is it essential for britain to comply with a system that the americans would themselves reject out of hand? is it not a blatant case of “do as i say, but not as i do”? of course it is. as for this precious “influence”, so dearly bought, i am not sure that it is all it is cracked up to be – or that britain’s eu membership is really so valuable to washington. since the very foundation of the common market, the washington establishment has supported the idea of european integration. the notable state department figure george w ball worked on drafting the schuman plan in 1950. he was a pallbearer at the funeral of jean monnet, the architect of the european project. the americans see the eu as a way of tidying up a continent whose conflicts have claimed huge numbers of american lives; as a bulwark against russia, and they have always conceived it to be in american interests for the uk – their number one henchperson, their fidus achates – to be deeply engaged. symmetrically, it has been a foreign office superstition that we are more important to washington if we can plausibly claim to have “influence” in brussels. but with every year that passes that influence diminishes. it is not just that we are being ever more frequently outvoted in the council of ministers, and our officials ever more heavily outnumbered in the commission. the whole concept of “pooling sovereignty” is a fraud and a cheat. we are not really sharing control with other eu governments: the problem is rather that all governments have lost control to the unelected federal machine. we don’t know who they are, or what language they speak, and we certainly don’t know what we can do to remove them at an election. "there is a profound difference between the us and the eu, and one that will never disappear" when americans look at the process of european integration, they make a fundamental category error. with a forgivable narcissism, they assume that we europeans are evolving – rather haltingly – so as to become just like them: a united states of europe, a single federal polity. that is indeed what the eurozone countries are trying to build; but it is not right for many eu countries, and it certainly isn’t right for britain. there is a profound difference between the us and the eu, and one that will never disappear. the us has a single culture, a single language, a single and powerful global brand, and a single government that commands national allegiance. it has a national history, a national myth, a demos that is the foundation of their democracy. the eu has nothing of the kind. in urging us to embed ourselves more deeply in the eu’s federalising structures, the americans are urging us down a course they would never dream of going themselves. that is because they are a nation conceived in liberty. they sometimes seem to forget that we are quite fond of liberty, too. articles there is no conspiracy. the eu is completely open about its superstate plan march 6, 2016 boris johnson's columns 3 comments now eu chiefs are struggling to remedy the defects in that project, and they have produced a report explaining what they want to do. it is called the “five presidents’ report” , and it came out last year and got rather buried in the aftermath of the general election. history teaches us that we would be mad to ignore this text. the five presidents in question are those of the european commission, the council, the european parliament, the european central bank and a body called the “european stability mechanism”. they want to prop up the euro by creating an all-out economic government of europe. the eu referendum - in numbers they want a euro-area treasury, with further pooling of tax and budgetary policy. they want to harmonise insolvency law, company law, property rights, social security systems – and there is no way the uk can be unaffected by this process. as the five presidents put it: “much can be already achieved through a deepening of the single market, which is important for all 28 eu member states.” so even though britain is out of the euro, there is nothing we can do to stop our friends from using “single market” legislation to push forward centralising measures that will help prop up the euro (or so they imagine), by aligning eu economic, social and fiscal policies. insofar as the recent “uk agreement” has any force, it expressly allows these measures to be pursued, and agrees the uk will not attempt to exercise a veto. in other words we will find ourselves dragged along willy-nilly , in spite of all protestations to the contrary. so-called “single market” measures affect us as much as they affect the eurozone – and the question therefore is what we mean by “single market”. the answer is a mystery – because the single market has changed beyond recognition. twenty years ago there was a clear conceptual difference in the eec between things that were done at an intergovernmental level – between member states, without the commission, the euro-parliament and the court of justice – and things that were part of the “single market”. foreign and defence co-operation was done intergovernmentally, and so was anything to do with police, or justice, or borders, or home affairs, or asylum, or immigration, or anything to do with human rights. then there were all the fields of eec competence: the common trade policies, the common agricultural policy, the competition policy, environment policy, and so on. since maastricht, that has all changed. successive treaties have vastly expanded the areas in which the eu bodies operate so that there is virtually no aspect of public policy that is untouched. the eu now takes an interest in energy policy, in humanitarian aid, in education, in health, and in human rights of all kinds. there is a common european space policy. all o

URL analysis for boris-johnson.com

http://www.boris-johnson.com/2016/03/06/there-is-no-conspiracy-the-eu-is-completely-open-about-its-superstate-plan/#comments
http://www.boris-johnson.com/2008/12/
http://www.boris-johnson.com/2005/05/
http://www.boris-johnson.com/2015/09/
http://www.boris-johnson.com/2010/12/
http://www.boris-johnson.com/#content
http://www.boris-johnson.com/2010/04/
http://www.boris-johnson.com/2011/08/
http://www.boris-johnson.com/2012/06/
http://www.boris-johnson.com/contact/
http://www.boris-johnson.com/2014/02/
http://www.boris-johnson.com/2012/11/
http://www.boris-johnson.com/2014/03/
http://www.boris-johnson.com/2009/10/
http://www.boris-johnson.com/2004/05/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: BORIS-JOHNSON.COM
Registry Domain ID: 124668288_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.123-reg.co.uk
Registrar URL: http://www.meshdigital.com
Updated Date: 2017-07-06T02:28:32Z
Creation Date: 2004-07-13T08:29:40Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-07-13T08:29:40Z
Registrar: 123-Reg Limited
Registrar IANA ID: 1515
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Name Server: NS1.139.XENSERVE.COM
Name Server: NS2.139.XENSERVE.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2017-08-05T20:00:47Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR 123-Reg Limited

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =boris-johnson.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME boris-johnson.com

  CHANGED 2017-07-06

  CREATED 2004-07-13

STATUS
ok https://icann.org/epp#ok

NSERVER

  NS1.139.XENSERVE.COM 80.82.123.158

  NS2.139.XENSERVE.COM 80.82.123.160

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .